The sentencing in Long Beach—and America’s sentence on itself

Prepare to be shocked and disturbed. In the extreme attack by a gang of black teenagers on three young white women in Los Angeles, in which one of the victims received disfiguring facial injuries requiring repeated surgery, Juvenile Court Judge Gibson Lee—who, despite his black-sounding name, is white—has sentenced the defendants to … home detention.

Despite agreeing that “it was an awful crime, terrible physical and emotional injuries,” Lee said he had to “pick the least restrictive disposition” – a decision that has support among juvenile law experts.

“The whole idea is not to simply throw people into the criminal justice system,” Daniel Macallair, executive director of the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice in San Francisco, told the Times. “The purpose of the juvenile justice system is not retribution; it’s not even punishment. It’s still rehabilitation.”

Of course these liberal rationalizations are only applied to black defendants. Such an attack by whites on blacks would have been become an Abu Ghraib to the nth power, a consuming preoccupation of America for months or years on end, resulting in long prison terms (or the juvenile equivalent) for the defendants.

Under the emerging multiracial order it is explicitly clear that whites are the legitimate targets of black and brown violence. With every increase in the nonwhite percentage of the U.S. population, whites are more at risk.

And the process will not stop at that mystical dreaded point when whites cease to be the majority, but will continue, downward and downward. If our immigration laws are not radically changed, and the white population as a result drops to 49 percent of the U.S. population by the year 2050, that will have been a decline of the white part of the population by 40 percent since 1960, when whites were 89 percent of the population. At that rate, by some time in the first half of the 22nd century, as little as three generations hence, whites will constitute 20 percent of the U.S. population, the same as the white proportion in South Africa today, where whites live in a state of seige under a regime of black savagery and racial vengeance. (See Ilana Mercer’s account of what has happened to her relatives under black rule, further discussed here.) True, blacks will not be the majority in that future America, as they are in South Africa. But together with Mestizos they will form the majority. Does anyone expect the Mestizo plurality of that future America, along with assorted Asians and Muslims, not to mention liberal whites like Gibson Lee, to stand for law and order and effectively protect the white minority from black and Mestizo racial violence?

So let’s be clear: through our immigration policies we are not just bringing about the loss of our majority status and of our political and cultural control over our own country; we are delivering our descendants into a state of powerless racial victimhood. And this historic catastrophe continues to unfold, even as “conservatives” preen about the fact that America is so much better than Europe at dealing with its racial minorities!

- end of initial entry -

Shrewsbury writes:

“Under the emerging multiracial order it is explicitly clear that whites are the legitimate targets of black and brown violence. With every increase in the nonwhite percentage of the U.S. population, whites are more at risk.”

Indeed, and this was already the case when last Shrewsbury did in Gotham dwell. Remember the absurd Howard Beach brouhaha back in ‘86, months of hysterical Times editorials about “lynch mobs” because some white kids with baseball bats chased some black drug-pushers and one of the pushers while fleeing was hit by a car and killed? (Irish and Italian “JDs” in Queens had been chasing strangers out of their neighborhoods with baseball bats forever, as was well known to young Shrewsbury and his ilk, but of course the carpetbagging Times editors wouldn’t know that; and, as mechanical liberals, and thus lacking even a trace of curiosity about the world, would not bother to ask.) Those poor schmucks were sent up the river for 30 years to be gang-raped to death. Then a few years later a black horde chased a white kid into a subway station, Times Square I think it was, where he was electrocuted by the third rail, and…and nothing. Nothing happened. No editorials. No arrests. (I think the kid’s poor mother wrote a plaintive book about her experience, wondering why nobody who was anybody gave a snit.)

It’s open season on whitey, and I’m kind of surprised this Long Beach incident even made the papers.

David B. writes:

I would add that the Long Beach affair and the Duke Hoax are not necessarily unconnected. Along with violent racial assaults on white people, there will be trumped-up legal charges against white people as some law enforcement types search for the Great White Defendant. Nifong didn’t care if his targets were innocent. The “special prosecutors” who replaced him still haven’t dismissed the case, as blacks continue to demand a trial and conviction.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at February 04, 2007 03:48 PM | Send