Barnhardt on the coming violence and how to prepare for it

I found out about Matthew Bracken’s article, “When The Music Stops—How America’s Cities May Explode In Violence” (see previous entry) at Ann Barnhardt’s site, where she wrote her own summary of it:

Posted by Ann Barnhardt—September 4, AD 2012 4:38 PM MST

Matt Bracken has written a piece over at Western Rifle Shooters that matches exactly how I have envisaged the coming collapse and civil war.

His belief that it will all begin with the rejection of EBT Foodstamps cards is, I think, spot-on.

Next comes the urban riots.

Then comes the rioters spilling into the suburbs.

Then comes full-blown chaos when the rioters realize that the cops alone can’t contain them. [LA replies: Like Bracken, Barnhardt omits a National Guard response.]

Then come the beatings, rapes and murders. In the open. In broad daylight. At heavily trafficked intersections.

Then comes the militia, which is what I intend to do when shizz gets real. That has been my intention all along, since the fall of 2008 when I knew that collapse and civil war was an inevitability.

Echoing Bracken, if I am either sandbagged or on a bipod, 400 yards is an EASY kill. Men are a hell of a lot bigger than prairie dogs, which is why learning to snipe on prairie dogs is so wise, in addition to good, wholesome fun.

When I tell you people to be buying LONG GUNS and ammo, I’m not kidding. Assault rifles and tens of thousands of rounds of ammunition is one of the best places to park wealth right now. And you better know how to use it, and you better sit your wife down, tell her to cut the sissy, whiny female bullshit and learn how to handle every weapon system in your arsenal. This isn’t a damn game or a TV show. Many, many women are going to find themselves as the ONLY THING standing between a hip-hop rape mob and their children.

If you haven’t watched my Vendee Genocide YouTube presentation, I clearly lay out the case that it is an absolute certainty that THERE WILL BE MASS RAPES when the inner city hip-hop contingent can no longer be contained by standard law enforcement. It isn’t even debatable.

Read the essay above, and then GET READY. QUICKLY.

- end of initial entry -

Paul T. writes:

I admire Ann Barnhardt, as you do … and yet…. is there anything about her, and in particular about her tone, that alarms you? I sense a level of unremitting rage there that brings to mind, well, Keith Olbermann or Thomas Fleming. Now of course Olbermann is angry about the wrong things, and Barnhardt is angry about the right things, and so the difference between them is enormous. And yet…. ! I welcome your views.

LA replies:

I greatly admired her Lindsey Graham-destroying, Koran-burning video last year. But when I looked at other things she had written, I got the feeling that she was something of an extreme personality and I didn’t keep reading her. Why then have I posted two entries on her today? The fact that she is openly defying the federal government by refusing to pay her taxes, basing her defiance on Christian principles, and (correctly it seems to me) calling the early Christian martyrs her models, at the least deserves a respectful hearing. And her scenario of greatly expanded black riots and attacks on whites, based on Matt Bracken’s article, seems entirely plausible to me.

Am I saying that such vast black riots are going to happen? No. I am saying that they are possible and that prudent persons should be aware of that possibility and prepare for it.

Brett A. writes:

If Obama were President I would expect him to federalize the national guards then hold off on deploying them in hopes of just such a scenario as Barnhardt predicts. This is something I have believed for some time now. What excuse would Obama have to hold off deploying troops? I’d say the administration and the media would pretend there was some kind of negotiation going on to try for a peaceful resolution or some such excuse. Then once the white/Asian suburbs have been terrorized into submission they would welcome martial law with open arms. The murders/torture/rapes would just be icing on the cake for the progressives in reaching their real goal which is martial law evolving into whatever tyrannical form of government they have planned.

September 11

Bruce B. writes:

Whenever someone says that catastrophes like collapse and civil war are inevitable and imminent, I start to think that they’re a kook. She sounds like Chuck Baldwin or Alex Jones, only worse. I’m also bothered by a woman that is enthusiastic about sniping. Would our Laura Wood be enthusiastic about sniping?

In response to Paul T., I don’t sense “unremitting rage” in Thomas Fleming. He seems like a pretty cool type to me.

LA replies:

Are we speaking about the same Thomas Fleming?

Andrew B. writes:

Sorry, but Ann seems truly unhinged. Her postings evidence an unhealthy obsession with violence, death, and rape. For being a so-called Christian, she certainly seems to have no concept of the way of peace.

Regarding tax resistance, she apparently has never read Matthew 22:15-22 (or Romans 13:1-8 or 1 Peter 2:13-17). You know, Render unto Caesar … Her dollars she apparently so cherishes, just like the Jews of Jesus’ day trafficking in the coins of Tiberias, came from the government she hates. There is no other source of them. They don’t grown on trees and are not made by anyone else, and certainly not by Ann Barnhardt.

LA replies:

The physical coins and dollars she possesses as a medium of exchange were made by the government. But that which gives her dollars the value they have certainly does not come from the government.

Andrew E writes:

In this entry, Andrew B. insults Ann Barnhardt with his claim that she is engaging in this tax strike so that she can keep her money. If he read her, Andrew would know that Barnhardt gave up a pretty good income when she voluntarily closed down her brokerage business on principle and has since been living off of her savings. It’s clear that Ann cares nothing for money and is motivated solely by her sincere belief that her immortal soul is in danger if she continues to support our government with her earnings. She argues that our federal government is now fully committed to funding and carrying out child sacrifice on a massive scale and that she can no longer pay tribute. If that is not a principled stand, I don’t know what is.

Regarding her enthusiasm for the subject of rape, has Andrew B. seen her video presentation on the Vendee genocide? Doubtful, but doing so would provide valuable context to her discussions of the likelihood and the forms of violence that could lie ahead.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at September 10, 2012 01:40 PM | Send

Email entry

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):