Earnest 13-year-old interviewed by dubious Brit about his presidential candidacy
So the slow-motion destruction of a women’s healthy organs and the creation of infertility in women is “being for women”?LA replies:
Yes. Because (1) women are defined as feminists; (2) being for women means supporting what women (namely feminists) CHOOSE. To support what they CHOOSE is to be for them. To oppose what they CHOOSE is to be against them. CHOICE—what a person desires—is the standard, not some objective standard such as health or fertility.
Posted by Lawrence Auster at February 16, 2012 08:18 AM | Send