A debate on global warming
From December 2009, here is a lively discussion on manmade global warming. Paul Nachman, describing himself an agnostic on the theory, said that the deniers were wrong to dismiss it wholesale, because as a scientific theory it is at least arguably true. I replied: “In the world of human beings and human actions, a theory advanced through such lies and orchestrated intimidation and for the purpose of gaining such tyrannical power over society has ZERO chance of being true. When something quacks, flies, and swims like a politicized, false theory, then the likelihood is 100 percent that it is a politicized, false theory.” Other readers then jumped into the fray.
Posted by Lawrence Auster at September 22, 2011 05:50 PM | Send