A WINNING WEEK FOR TERROR
WEST’S HUGS FAIL TO STOP THUGS
By RALPH PETERS
August 25, 2009
LAST week, we learned the answer to the hoary question “What does a Scots man wear under his kilt?” When it comes to terrorism, the answer’s “a white flag.”
But Scotland’s craven release, “on humanitarian grounds,” of Abdel Basset Ali al-Megrahi, the mastermind of the bombing that killed 270 passengers aboard a Pan Am flight two decades ago, was merely the noisiest terrorist triumph during a week of shame.
And noisy it was: Libya’s Moammar Khadafy staged a huge homecoming party for the terrorist. (Think that would’ve happened while W was president?) The gleeful Khadafy rubbed the West’s snout in our feckless taste for appeasement.
Appeasement was also the watchword back in the United States, where Yale University Press delighted Islamist extremists by removing all illustrations from a scholarly work about the Danish cartoon debacle—not just the caricatures of Mohammed.
Elsewhere, the casualty count went beyond book illustrations. In Iraq, Islamist terrorists staged massive suicide bombings in Baghdad. Over a hundred Iraqis died, with more than a thousand wounded. The foreign and finance ministries lie in rubble. The government’s reeling.
Our president went to the beach.
In Afghanistan, the Taliban crippled the national elections so severely that the eventual “winner” won’t have much of a mandate. Despite madcap ballot-box stuffing, the final tally will probably show that less than half of the eligible population voted—fewer than one in five in the crucial south.
Afghans put more faith in Taliban threats than in government promises. US and Western officials are struggling to paint a smile on the face of the corpse, but the vote was divisive, not unifying. On Sunday, Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, admitted that the Afghan situation is “serious and deteriorating.”
That’s what happens when, instead of killing our enemies, we try hugs.
Iran? We all know that its nuclear program is purely for peaceful purposes. That’s why, just last week, President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad chose a Revolutionary Guard commander, Ahmad Vahidi, as his new defense minister.
Interpolwants Vahidi for running the 1994 bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires—85 dead, 300 wounded. Soon, he may have his trigger finger on nuclear weapons. But no need for Israel to worry: The Obama administration will negotiate with Tehran.
Returning to America, the establishment media continued to portray imprisoned terrorists as victims, while further chastising the bygone Bush administration for rudeness to mass murderers. (Any self-righteous journalist care to spend a night in a cell with one of the butchers whose “rights” have been infringed?)
Then the White House took all major interrogations away from the CIA, further restricting the techniques allowed to stop terrorists.
And now the administration’s hard-left Justice Department—perhaps the most extreme in our country’s history—is on another witch hunt to prosecute CIA patriots who did all they could to keep our citizens safe.
Last but not least, a minor legal case bears enormous implications: A 17-year-old female Muslim immigrant to the US, Fathima Rifqa Bary, begged our justice system not to return her to her family.
She fears she’ll be the victim of an honor killing.
Smooching with the boys? Naw. Much worse: She converted to Christianity—still an offense for which, many Muslims believe, Islam (that “religion of peace”) prescribes death. Fleeing from her Ohio home to Florida, she’s in protective custody, awaiting a judge’s verdict on Sept. 3.
Not all of the details are clear, but the big picture is: A legal resident of our country, where religious freedom is constitutionally guaranteed, fears death at the hands of her relatives and her community because she changed her faith.
If she’s sent “home” and murdered, will the crime be written off as freedom of religion?
Coddled by Washington Democrats and Republicans, extremist mullahs here in the United States—often funded by our “friends” the Saudis—invoke religious freedom at the drop of a prayer rug. And our elected officials cower.
Well, it’s high time for Muslim clerics across this country to issue a public statement explicitly denouncing all violence against Muslims who switch faiths. [LA replies: I see. Muslim clerics must publicly renounce Islamic law. And what if they don’t?] This is America, folks. If a Methodist turns Muslim, fine. But if a Muslim becomes an Evangelical, that, too, must be tolerated. [LA replies: I see. Apostasy “must” be tolerated. And what if it’s not?] The Koran is not a license to kill in this country.
(And that dating thing? Murder over that’s a no-no, too.) [LA replies: Murder is already against the law in all 50 states of this country, and even in the District of Columbia. Is telling Muslims—who, by the way, believe in sharia law, not U.S. law—that murder is against U.S. law, going to stop them from believing in and following sharia law?]
One year ago, terrorists were on the defensive around the world. Then a new US administration condemned our country while “reaching out” to our enemies.
And here we are.
[end of article]
Who does Peters think he is, Robert Spencer? That’s Spencer’s schtick, going on and on, year after year, about how Islamic clerics must declare that they don’t believe in—Islam. And Spencer’s waiting, he’s waiting for that magical moment, he’s an open-minded, tolerant, rational fellow, he’s waiting…