Muslim in Brooklyn dismembers young woman

It’s such a great idea to allow millions of nonwhite men from sexually repressive, Third-World countries into a white Western country like the U.S. where advertising and entertainment are constantly sending out messages of paradisal sex and where the most beautiful and enticing women in the world are walking around half naked. I mean, it’s really a great idea, isn’t?

In Brooklyn, a 53-year-old Muslim cabdriver who had fantasized for years about a 27-year-old Italian-American woman who lived in his neighborhood murdered and dismembered her.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: modern liberal society is a factory for producing young white female murder victims.

From the New York Post:

SMITTEN CABBIE ‘CUT UP’ BEAUTY
By JOHN DOYLE and JAMIE SCHRAM
April 28, 2009

A demented Brooklyn livery cabdriver who obsessively fantasized about a beautiful woman in his neighborhood called 911 and told cops, “I killed her. Go inside,” police said yesterday.

Cops then found Almuwallad Saleh sitting on the front stoop of his Coney Island building Sunday night before they entered his apartment—and found the dismembered body of Jessica Giudici, 27, stuffed into four heavy-duty plastic bags, cops said.

One bag held her torso; a second her arms, legs and one eye. A third contained her thighs. Her head was in the fourth bag. Her face and mouth were carved up, police said.

Saleh, 53, “was angry that she was seeing another man,” a law-enforcement source said.

Relatives and friends said that Giudici had never had a romantic relationship with Saleh—and that she lived with her longtime boyfriend.

Her family and friends knew the cabdriver had been smitten with Giudici for about two years and said she called him when she needed a cab. Friends said he gave them a discount on rides because he liked her.

“We trusted him,” said her best friend Michelle Cooper, 29. “He came to my baby shower. He knew he couldn’t have her.

“He used to say, ‘I love her. I’m going to marry her.’ We took it as a joke. We didn’t think it was serious. We couldn’t understand what he was saying half the time so we would brush him off.”

On Sunday, Saleh picked up Jessica outside her family’s home on West 33rd Street at about 5 p.m. to take her to a check-cashing place, friends said. That was the last time she was seen alive.

At 10 p.m. on Sunday, Saleh, of 2950 W. 19th St., called cops and said he had been drinking and was going to kill himself.

After police made the grisly discovery. he was charged with second-degree murder and criminal weapons possession.

With Rita Delfiner and AP
jamie.schram@nypost.com

See Black and other nonwhite violence against whites: a grim collection.

- end of initial entry -

Bill writes from Maryland

There is a second story here—the woman and those around her were entirely oblivious to the danger signals broadcast loud and clear by Almuwallad Saleh:

Her family and friends knew the cabdriver had been smitten with Giudici for about two years and said she called him when she needed a cab. Friends said he gave them a discount on rides because he liked her. “We trusted him,” said her best friend Michelle Cooper, 29. “He came to my baby shower. He knew he couldn’t have her.” “He used to say, ‘I love her. I’m going to marry her.’ We took it as a joke. We didn’t think it was serious.”

I have long wondered why women court danger in this way. If you ask them why they leave their cars in dark corners of the parking lot or jog alone late at night they invariably deny that the danger exists, and often find it strange or amusing that you should ask. The only explanations I can come up with are:

1. Developmental arrest: a mature recognition of the danger of male violence would force them permanently out of the comfortable infantile world of nice people who mean them well into the colder and more threatening world of adulthood.

2. Vanity: they secretly welcome the idea of sexual assault because it is a confirmation of their attractiveness—the assailant has usually carefully planned the attack, chosen them as his specific target and is risking 25 to life, so he must want them badly, ergo they are attractive.

LA replies:

When a Muslim repeatedly says about a young woman, “I love her. I’m going to marry her,” and instead of distancing herself from him, she invites further contacts, and her friends think it’s “a joke,” that’s Eloihood. An almost criminal lack of awareness of human realities.

How many murders and mass murders have been preceded by tell-tale behavior by the killer that everyone around him thought was a “joke”? As I remember, at Columbine High School, pupils thought it was a “joke” when Klebold and Harris said they would kill people.

Your second theory doesn’t make sense to me. I think it’s a combination of the naivete of your first theory plus feminist ego: “I can do anything I like, women can walk around dressed any way they like any where they want to do it, and no one can tell us otherwise.”

Even “conservative Republican” women now believe that. Remember the in-your-face YouTube created by Michelle Malkin and other “conservative” women with the theme, “Don’t you dare tell women that we can’t do whatever we want.” It wasn’t about the kind of behavior that puts women in danger, but the basic arrogant mindset was the same.

Then, having unmanned men, the women turn around and expect men to be strong and protective them—when the woman wants that.

Christopher C. writes:

But the fact that poor Brooklyn girl accepted discounted fares from that murderer—and apparently with her family’s acquiesence!—jumped off the page for me. There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch.

That’s what I would focus on at sentencing. Yes! Incredible as it seems, blame the victim and her family! And it will probably work, don’t you think? As wrong and as out of proportion as it is, this guy will avoid the death penalty because of a combination of a sense of guilt and a sense of mercy of the host community. Let’s end with another cliche: Only in America.

Let’s not. Let’s end with a useful statement: How stupid we are, individually and collectively, in so many ways, to fall for the lie that people are just economic units. They’re not. And they’ll eat you alive to prove it.

I pretty sure I could save this guy from the death penalty.

David B. writes:

Not much news yet on the Brooklyn dismemberment. Nothing on CNN.com/Crime. They have a lot on young white women killing children, a favorite story for the MSM.

Laura W. writes:

While Bill of Maryland makes a good point regarding developmental arrest, his second suggestion of why women get into these situations is completely unreal. There is no sane woman on earth who welcomes sexual assault. Most fear it so much they convince themselves it couldn’t possibly happen to them and devise a fantasy world of their own making.

An additional reason is plain old niceness. Women see a foreigner who can’t speak English and who represents the poor and oppressed of the world. He awakens reckless maternal instincts.

“Albert Nock” writes:

The stats do not support your contention. It is actually a factory for producing criminal murder victims. That’s why whites and ESPECIALLY females have such low victimization rates.

LA replies:

I’m not talking about some huge epidemic of murder, I was not saying that there is a vast number of white murder victims. In fact I’m not talking about statistics at all. I’m talking about what we see happening every week in the news. I’m talking about human beings. Each of these crimes matters and happens for certain reasons. There is a distinct pattern to these crimes, the Eloihood on one side, the predatory quality on the other, which I’ve shown over and over. It’s as though a pre-set process keeps resulting in these very similar murders, which keep occurring steadily. That’s what I mean by a factory. Further, these crimes express something about us, as people, as a society. This is what I’m interested in, the mindset and beliefs and behaviors that make these murders possible, along with the systematic ignoring of this phenomenon by society.

I know that talking about the lives and deaths of individual human beings as moral actors and as representative of their society, rather than just looking at overall statistics, will seem strange to a Darwinian, who is only interested in, and only regards as real, macro events occurring in a whole population, and has no interest in human being as moral actors.

As for your comment that society is really a factory for producing criminal murder victims, we would expect criminals to be murdered more than anyone else. Disordered, violent people tend to die in disorderly, violent ways. That’s normal, that’s to be expected, and it’s no particular loss to society. What is not normal, and what is a terrible loss to society, is what we have under liberalism, with white victims, particularly females, repeatedly putting themselves like sheep in situations where they are murdered by nonwhites. As I’ve said, the murder of whites by nonwhites, and the ignoring of this by society, are an expression and symbol of national suicide. That the West is committing suicide, as all serious paleo and traditional conservatives agree, and that modern society is a factory for producing white female murder victims, which I argue, are two aspects of the same overall phenomenon.

The difference between Mr. Nock’s and my view of society is that he sees society as a material operation, the character of which can best be stated in numbers. I see society as the unfolding and expression of man’s mind and soul. A society that believes deadly false things will express those beliefs through self-destructive behaviors, cultural manifestions, and so on. The materialist, such as Steve Sailer, with his reductive explanations such as elitism and sexual competition, can never explain why some societies (assuming the same genetic level of ability) have creative and sustainable ways of living, and others have destructive ways of living, since elitism and sexual competition are active in all societies. The success of a society depends on men’s choice of the good and true over the bad and false; and this is something that is outside the materialist’s ken.

April 29

Adela G. writes:

From the article: “Her family and friends knew the cabdriver had been smitten with Giudici for about two years and said she called him when she needed a cab. Friends said he gave them a discount on rides because he liked her.”

Reminds me of a song:

She sailed away
On a bright and sunny day
On the back of a crocodile
You see, said she
He’s as tame as he can be
I’ll ride him down the Nile
Well, the croc winked his eye
As she waved them all goodbye
Wearing a happy smile
At the end of the ride
The lady was inside
And the smile was on the crocodile.


Posted by Lawrence Auster at April 28, 2009 01:55 PM | Send
    

Email entry

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):