That ol’ Muslim democracy, it jus’ keeps rollin’ along

What a great victory for America in its promotion of Muslim democracy, which means the promotion of Muslim, uh, Islam! First a mob stormed the U.S. embassy in Cairo, tearing down the U.S. flag and putting up a black al Qaeda flag in its place. Then a Libyan mob murdered the U.S. ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, a former envoy to and facilitator of the Libyan rebels, along with three of his staff members as they drove away from the U.S. consulate in Benghazi seeking safer quarters. All because of a movie made by private individuals in the U.S., including pastor Terry Jones, that “insulted” the prophet Muhammad.

And Obama’s first response to the murder of our diplomatic personnel was not to condemn the killers, but to condemn the private individuals in the U.S. who made the film. In doing so, he was in effect conforming to the demand by the Muslim Brotherhood, which thanks to U.S.-promoted Muslim democracy now rules Egypt, that the U.S. government issue a formal apology to the Muslim world for a movie made in the U.S. by private individuals. As reported in the New York Times, Obama said:

“While the United States rejects efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others, we must all unequivocally oppose the kind of senseless violence that took the lives of these public servants.”

Got that? He condemns a movie made by private individuals before he condemns the murder of our diplomats.

Similarly, earlier in the day, before the attack on the U.S. embassy in Cairo, the embassy had issued this statement:

“The United States Embassy in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims—as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions.”

Didn’t do much good, did it? Since after that statement was issued, the mob proceeded to invade the embassy. But this is what we wanted, and what we want. We as a country support democracy, i.e. universal open elections, as the highest good, and therefore we support whatever democracy brings about. And, in Islamland, democracy automatically brings about Islamic rule, which means, among other things, the rule that anyone who insults Muhammad must die, and that if an individual in a foreign country insults Muhammad, it is as if that entire country and its government had insulted Muhammad.

The Times article is quite interesting, and since some readers can’t access that paper, I am copying the entire piece below.

U.S. Envoy to Libya Is Killed in Attack
By DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK, ALAN COWELL and STEVEN LEE MYERS
CAIRO—The United States ambassador to Libya, J. Christopher Stevens, was killed along with three of his staff members in a furious attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi on Tuesday night by an armed mob angry over a short American-made video mocking Islam’s founding prophet, the White House and Libyan officials said on Wednesday.

In a statement confirming the four fatalities, President Obama said he strongly condemned the killings and had ordered increased security at American diplomatic posts around the world. It was the first death of an American envoy abroad in more than two decades.

The attack at the compound in Benghazi was far more deadly than administration officials first announced on Tuesday night, when Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said one American had been killed and one injured.

Another of those killed was Sean Smith, an information management officer who joined the foreign service 10 years ago, Mrs. Clinton said in a statement. The State Department did not identify the other two, pending notification of their relatives. Mr. Smith, who was a husband and father of two, previously served in Iraq, Canada and the Netherlands.

“All the Americans we lost in yesterday’s attacks made the ultimate sacrifice,” Mrs. Clinton said. “We condemn this vicious and violent attack that took their lives, which they had committed to helping the Libyan people reach for a better future.”

Mr. Obama’s statement did not disclose details of the attack. Mr. Stevens, the ambassador, arrived in Libya in May after serving as an envoy to the Libyan rebels who overthrew Libya’s leader, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, last year.

“While the United States rejects efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others, we must all unequivocally oppose the kind of senseless violence that took the lives of these public servants,” Mr. Obama said, calling Mr. Stevens “a courageous and exemplary representative of the United States” who had “selflessly served our country and the Libyan people at our mission in Benghazi” and, as ambassador, “supported Libya’s transition to democracy.”

“The brave Americans we lost represent the extraordinary service and sacrifices that our civilians make every day around the globe. As we stand united with their families, let us now redouble our own efforts to carry their work forward,” the statement said.

The killings threatened to upset Washington’s relations with the new Libyan government that took over after the ouster of Colonel Qaddafi and sour American public opinion about the prospects of the democratic opening of the Arab Spring.

Mr. Stevens, a veteran of American diplomatic missions in Libya, served in Benghazi during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi, and he was widely admired by the Libyan rebels for his support of their struggle.

The news of his death emerged on Wednesday after violence spilled over the American Consulate in Benghazi and demonstrators stormed the fortified walls of the American Embassy in Cairo.

Few details of the way events unfolded in Benghazi were immediately available, but the killing of the ranking American official in Libya raised questions about the vulnerability of American officials at a time when the profound changes sweeping the Arab world have hardly dispelled the rage against the United States that still smolders in pockets around the region.

Libya’s interim president, Mohammed Magarief, apologized for the attack, describing the attack as “cowardly” and offering condolences, The Associated Press reported. Speaking to reporters, he said the culprits would be brought to justice and pledged to maintain close relations with the United States.

Tuesday’s violence came on the 11th anniversary of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and was inspired by Egyptian media reports about a 14-minute trailer for the video, called “Innocence of Muslims,” that was released on the Web. The violence provoked by the video recalled the wave of rage and protest in 2005 that followed the publication of 12 cartoons in a Danish newspaper lampooning the Prophet Muhammad.

An unidentified Libyan official in Benghazi told Reuters that Mr. Stevens and three staff members were killed in Benghazi “when gunmen fired rockets at them.” It was not clear where in the city the attack took place. The Libyan official said the ambassador was being driven from the consulate building to a safer location when gunmen opened fire, Reuters said.

In a message on Twitter, Deputy Prime Minister Mustafa Abu Shagur of Libya said on Wednesday that he condemned “the cowardly act of attacking the U.S. consulate and the killing of Mr. Stevens and the other diplomats.”

Agence France-Presse quoted the Libyan Interior Ministry as saying Mr. Stevens and the three staff members were killed when a mob attacked the consulate in Benghazi. Al Jazeera’s English-language Web site said Mr. Stevens died of smoke inhalation after a mob set fire to the building.

In Italy, the Corriere della Sera newspaper Web site showed images of what it said was the American Consulate in Benghazi ablaze with men carrying automatic rifles and waving V-for-victory signs, silhouetted against the burning buildings. One photograph showed a man closely resembling Mr. Stevens apparently unconscious, his face seeming to be smudged with smoke and his eyes closed.

Mr. Stevens, conversant in Arabic and French, had worked at the State Department since 1991 after a spell as an international trade lawyer in Washington. He taught English as a Peace Corps volunteers in Morocco from 1983 to 1985, the State Department Web site said.

According to the State Department, five American ambassadors had been killed by terrorists before the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi. The most recent was Adolph Dubs, killed after being kidnapped in Afghanistan in 1979. The others were John Gordon Mein, in Guatemala in 1968, Cleo A. Noel, Jr., in Sudan in 1973, Rodger P. Davies, in Cyprus in 1974 and Francis E. Meloy, Jr., in Lebanon in 1976.

The trigger for the anti-American outbursts was the amateurish, American-made video opens with scenes of Egyptian security forces standing idle as Muslims pillage and burn the homes of Egyptian Christians. Then it cuts to cartoonish scenes depicting the Prophet Muhammad as a child of uncertain parentage, a buffoon, a womanizer, a homosexual, a child molester and a greedy, bloodthirsty thug.

The trailer was uploaded to YouTube by Sam Bacile, whom The Wall Street Journal Web site identified as a 52-year old Israeli-American real estate developer in California. He told the Web site he had raised $5 million from 100 Jewish donors to make the film. “Islam is a cancer,” Mr. Bacile was quoted as saying.

The video gained international attention when a Florida pastor began promoting it along with his own proclamation of Sept. 11 as “International Judge Muhammad Day.”

In a statement on Tuesday, the pastor, Terry Jones of Gainesville, Fla., called the film “an American production, not designed to attack Muslims but to show the destructive ideology of Islam” and said it “further reveals in a satirical fashion the life of Muhammad.”

He said the embassy and consulate attacks illustrated that Muslims “have no tolerance for anything outside of Muhammad” and called Islam “a total deception.”

Mr. Jones inspired deadly riots in Afghanistan in 2010 and 2011 by first threatening to burn copies of the Koran and then burning one in his church. He also once reportedly hanged President Obama in effigy.

In the violence in Benghazi on Tuesday, protesters with automatic rifles and rocket-propelled grenades attacked the American Consulate and set it on fire, Libyan officials said. Some news reports said American guards inside the consulate had fired their weapons, and a brigade of Libyan security forces arriving on the scene had battled the attackers in the streets as well.

Local Islamist militant groups capitalizing on the security vacuum have claimed responsibility for some attacks, and some reports on Tuesday suggested that one such group, Ansar al-Sharia, had claimed responsibility for that day’s assault. But representatives of Ansar al-Sharia told a news conference on Wednesday that they were not responsible. It is unclear how many local Islamist groups in Libya may be operating under that name, which means the Supporters of Islamic Law.

In Cairo, thousands of unarmed protesters had gathered outside the American embassy during the day. By nightfall, some had climbed over the wall around the embassy compound and destroyed a flag hanging inside. The vandals replaced it with a black flag favored by ultraconservatives and militants and labeled with the most basic Islamic profession of faith: “There is no god but God, and Muhammad is his prophet.” Embassy guards fired guns into the air, but a large contingent of Egyptian riot police officers on hand to protect the embassy evidently did not use their weapons against the crowd, and the protest continued, largely without violence, into the night.

A spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood, the mainstream Islamist group and the sponsor of Egypt’s first elected president, Mohamed Morsi, urged the United States government on Tuesday to prosecute the “madmen” behind the video, according to the English-language Web site of the state newspaper, Al Ahram.

The spokesman asked for a formal apology from the United States government and warned that events like the video were damaging Washington’s relations with the Muslim world. He also emphasized that any protests should remain peaceful and respect property.

There should be “civilized demonstrations of the Egyptian people’s displeasure with this film,” the Brotherhood spokesman said, according to the newspaper Web site. “Any nonpeaceful activity will be exploited by those who hate Islam to defame the image of Egypt and Muslims.”

Bracing for trouble before the start of the protests here and in Libya, the American Embassy released a statement shortly after noon that appeared to refer to Mr. Jones: “The United States Embassy in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims—as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions.” It later denounced the “unjustified breach of our embassy.”

Apparently unaware of the timing of the first embassy statement, the Republican presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, put out a statement just before midnight Tuesday saying, “It’s disgraceful that the Obama administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks.” Mr. Romney also said he was “outraged” at the attacks on the embassy and consulate.

Responding to Mr. Romney’s statement, Ben LaBolt, an Obama campaign spokesman, said, “We are shocked that, at a time when the United States of America is confronting the tragic death of one of our diplomatic officers in Libya, Governor Romney would choose to launch a political attack.”

David D. Kirkpatrick reported from Cairo, Alan Cowell from London and Steven Lee Myers from Washington. Suliman Ali Zway contributed reporting from Tripoli, Libya.

- end of initial entry -


James P. writes:

Gotta love the passive voice in the NYT headline:

U.S. Envoy to Libya Is Killed in Attack

Not “Muslim Mob Kills U.S. Ambassador.” No, the envoy “was killed,” through some mysterious, unknown agency. Attacked by bears? A swarm of killer bees? Mossad-trained sharks? Who knows!

Daniel S. writes:

Notice the difference in thought process between the liberals and Muslim radicals. For the liberals everyone is viewed in a purely atomic manner, thus the acts of Muslim militants are “isolated incidents” that have no tangible or meaningful relationship to Islam or the wider Muslim community. For the Muslim radicals every American or Westerner is morally responsible for the acts of isolated individual Americans or other Westerners, and thus deserving of death. Thus in the eyes of the Muslims every Westerner or Christian is responsible for the Danish cartoons, or Pope Benedict’s negative characterization of Muhammad, or the actions of Terry Jones.

Jeremy L. writes:

The WSJ reports:

A witness to the mob late Tuesday said that the Libyan protesters had identified themselves as members of Ansar al-Shariah, an armed brigade that follows the conservative religious Islam of some jihadis. Ansar delivered a statement early Wednesday denying that its members were behind the attack. But a man identified as a leader of the Ansar brigade told broadcaster Al Jazeera that its members took part in the Benghazi attack in response to the inflammatory film but that there wasn’t an order for them to do so.

And yet, they are only “suspected” religious extremists. Apparently, we’re putting lipstick on a pig again. God forbid we call them what they are.

Andrew B. writes:

The Black Flag (called “The Eagle”) being flown is not an Al Qaeda flag implying some sort of membership in or union with that organization, but rather the age old banner of jihad used by Muslims jihadis for over 1000 years. Al Qaeda’s use of it is a declaration of their devotion to the endless struggle for jihad and the triumph of Shariah by Islam.

It should thus be viewed in the same way as would the raising by a Christian mob or army of a white banner with a red cross over the Dome of the Rock or Mecca. It doesn’t mean they are a group of Templars. But it IS a declaration of a particular religious view, like a profession of faith.


Posted by Lawrence Auster at September 12, 2012 09:31 AM | Send
    

Email entry

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):