Herman Cain’s extremely odd denial that he knew anything about the settlement with his accusers

Jim C. writes:

The issue is not whether he’s guilty but how lame his denial is. See Jennifer Rubin’s excellent analysis.

LA replies:

I agree it’s a good analysis, but if he were a promoter of global democracy, would Rubin be so clear-eyed and tough on him?

Posted by Lawrence Auster at October 31, 2011 09:44 PM | Send

Email entry

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):