Follow-up on Carter Strange beating: prosecutor says it was robbery, not a racially motivated hate crime
David B. writes:
Here is the most detailed account of the Carter Strange beating. Strange is back home with very severe injuries.LA replies:
It passes belief that the prosecutor would say that this was nothing more than a robbery. Obviously the extreme beating went way, way beyond a robbery. There is no limit to the lies officials and media in liberal society will tell to avoid facts that violate liberal dogma.
Mark Jaws writes:
You make good points, Don Lorenzo, and that is, if the intent of the feral thugs were simply to rob Carter Strange, why not take his wallet and head down to the liquor store for some Colt 45? Then again, we could use the prevailing liberal “logic” and proclam that Emmet Till was not killed because he was black. He simply had the misfortune of whistling at a white woman who had a very jealous husband. Unless we can prove it, we must conclude race had nothing to do with Till’s murder.James P. writes:
David B. wrote:Hannon writes:
Your mention of the severity of the beating in the Strange case, by way of indication that this event was not merely a robbery, reminded me of something a friend told me years ago. She said that in Nairobi robbers will not simply accept an offer of a wallet or purse, but generally will beat up the victim no matter how the victim responds. Peachy, huh?
Posted by Lawrence Auster at June 28, 2011 11:10 AM | Send