Utah and the Mormon Church reach out to illegal aliens

Vincent Chiarello writes:

Early last week I heard a staff member of the House Judiciary Committee discuss the prospects of patriotic immigration reform in this session of Congress. His remarks confirmed my view that the GOP leadership in the House of Representatives is not planning to implement the people’s will on this issue. Even more disturbing was the news that the Utah legislature has passed a series of laws, soon to be signed by the governor, that may weaken most, if not all, of the momentum for such reform obtained through Arizona’s landmark legislation last year.

Writing in the Washington Post on March 11, Lee Hockstader, a member of the Post’s editorial staff, was overflowing with praise for Utah’s action, which will gut any enforcement of federal legislation dealing with illegal aliens and provide them with work permits and drivers licenses. The “Utah Compact,” he tells us, was drafted last fall by “business leaders and conservative elites” who “feared Utah would follow in Arizona’s footsteps and risk losing tens of million of dollar in tourism and convention business as Arizona did.” But I believe that the truth lies elsewhere.

The Catholic Church has been justifiably criticized for its policy toward illegal aliens in this country. Pro-illegal alien positions adopted by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops have created serious tensions amongst congregants in many parishes, especially those affected by the hordes of illegal aliens. But flying under the radar is the equally serious undermining of our immigration laws by the Mormon Church, most of which is not reported.

Whether it be along the U.S. border with Mexico, where dozens of Mormon missionaries aid and abet illegal aliens, or within the country, the Mormon Church now considers illegal aliens as “targets of opportunity” for evangelical outreach. In northern Virginia, where I live, Mormon missionaries are seen going from house to house in areas where illegal alien families reside. Hockstader remarks: “Advocates of the compact included the police, some key elected officials and, critically, the Mormon church, whose members include perhaps 90 percent of Utah’s state lawmakers.”

The Utah Compact may not have legs, in that the Mormon Church has much less influence in other states of the nation. But what is incomprehensible is that Utah, this supposed bedrock of conservative Republicanism, has signaled that it will not obey federal law. As the House Judiciary Committee staff member rhetorically asked, will the Obama administration sue the State of Utah as it did Arizona? I very much doubt it.

Here is Lee Hockstader’s column in the March 11 Washington Post:

The ‘Utah Way’ toward immigration reform


Utah, where Republicans outnumber Democrats by better than three to one in the state legislature, has passed the nation’s most liberal—and most reality-based—policy on illegal immigration. And the Republican governor is expected to sign it.

The legislation includes both a watered-down enforcement provision that police say won’t make much difference and a guest-worker program that would make all the difference in the world—if it survives constitutional challenge—by granting legal status to undocumented workers and allowing them to live normal lives. In a nutshell, it’s a one-state version of the overarching immigration reform package that Congress has repeatedly tried, and failed, to enact.

Conservative Republicans here—and Republicans don’t get much more conservative than the statehouse variety in Salt Lake—say their bill is a gauntlet thrown down to the feds for their inability to deal with illegal immigration and the nation’s demand for unskilled labor.

That’s one way of looking at it. But the “Utah Way,” as some are calling it, is also a fraternal attack on Republicans, in Washington and elsewhere, whose only strategy is to demonize, criminalize and deport 11 million illegal immigrants.

Karl Rove, Jeb Bush and Newt Gingrich are among the Republican grandees who have distanced themselves from that approach and warned of the peril it poses for the party. In the wake of Arizona’s legislation last year, a wave of copycat bills would go a long way toward permanently ridding the GOP of Hispanics, the nation’s largest and fastest-growing minority.

But it’s in Utah that the Republican deportation caucus has been treated to real abuse. What’s interesting is that it’s coming from unimpeachable conservatives. If you want to see the most corrosive long-term wedge issue facing the GOP, come to Salt Lake City.

Utah’s guest-worker bill doesn’t grant citizenship, of course, but in every other way it’s exactly what national Republicans have derided as “amnesty.” It would grant work permits to undocumented immigrants, and their immediate families, who pay a fine, clear a criminal background check and study English.

The bill’s chief sponsor, state Rep. Bill Wright, is a plain-spoken dairy farmer who describes his politics as “extremely” conservative, likes Sarah Palin and believes he may have once voted for a Democrat—possibly 40 years ago for sheriff. He admires the work ethic of the Hispanic farmhands he’s employed over the years and doesn’t care much for anything the government does, least of all the idea that it might deport millions of immigrant workers and their families.

“That’s not gonna happen,” Wright told me. “They’ve got cars, they’ve got money borrowed, they own property, they are intertwined. Just be real and face facts the way they are.”

A milestone in setting the stage for Wright’s legislation was the “Utah Compact,” a pithy declaration of reform principles drafted last fall by business leaders and conservative elites, who feared Utah would follow in Arizona’s footsteps and risk losing tens of millions of dollars in tourism and convention business, as Arizona did. The compact helped swing public opinion in Utah away from the illegal-immigrant bashers who admired Arizona’s law.

“They’ve had their 15 minutes in the media and now the adults are going to start talking about how to handle matters,” said Paul Mero, executive director of Utah’s most prominent conservative think tank, the Sutherland Institute, who helped draft the compact. “We’ve been able to break through that political barrier put up by the wing nuts who see every brown person as a criminal.”

Advocates of the compact included the police, some key elected officials and, critically, the Mormon church, whose members include perhaps 90 percent of Utah’s state lawmakers. They understood that the fast-growing Hispanic community, which counts for 13 percent of Utah’s population and may include more than 100,000 undocumented workers, is vital to the state’s tourism, agriculture and construction industries.

The advocates’ genius was to reframe the cause of immigration reform, including the guest-worker program, as fundamentally a conservative project. In the face of sound bites from reform opponents such as “What part of ‘illegal’ don’t you understand?” Utah conservatives shot back with: What part of destroying the economy don’t you understand? And by the way, what part of breaking up families don’t you understand?

The question is whether Utah will inspire similar movements in other states or whether it will remain the exception. On that, the evidence is mixed.

Discouragingly, neither Utah’s two U.S. senators nor its three representatives have backed the Utah Compact or the just-passed state legislation. Most mainstream Republicans remain stuck on enforcement, which is code for deportation. And the Mormon church, which did much to sway public opinion and to inoculate the guest-worker legislation from conservative attack, has limited influence outside the state.

Encouragingly, though, several conservative states have rejected Arizona-style bills this year. Reform advocates are at work on versions of the Utah Compact in Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Maine, Washington, Idaho and Oregon.

The lesson from the “Utah Way” is that pragmatists in search of solutions can initiate a reform movement outside the legislature and build a case and a coalition that appeal to conservatives. By offering ideas that may provide a fix in the absence of federal action, they may trump the tired slogans of opponents of reform.

The writer is a member of the editorial page staff.

- end of initial entry -

Ken Hechtman writes:

The problem with the Utah Compact isn’t that it has no legs. The problem is that it has no teeth. It’s just the Chamber of Commerce version of the 1980s and 1990s “sanctuary city” concept and everyone understood that the sanctuary cities were almost completely symbolic. You can’t actually legislate amnesty in one city or even in one state because the only residence permits the federal government recognizes are its own. The federal INS doesn’t need to recognize a State of Utah guestworker permit any more than the federal DEA needs to recognize a State of Montana medical marijuana license.

Debra C. writes:

I learned about 18 months ago that the Mormon-owned Marriott is heavily invested in the amnesty movement; this knowledge came by way of a NumbersUSA video I saw, a taping of a meeting held in Washington DC of amnesty proponents who were being instructed in how to implement their agenda. Among the attendees were people from Marriott. So, in addition to the Mormon Church itself seeing illegals as “a target rich” environment, there is also the Mormon “elite” who promote open borders.

Sorry I don’t have a link.

LA replies:

Speaking of Mormons and immigration, what about Glenn Beck? I think he is an uncritical supporter of our present immigration policies.

Mariusz writes:

With regards to Beck, He’s extremely conservative on immigration and despised George Bush for his policies. He’s a supporter of Tom Tancredo, who I think he called the best conservative in the country once.

Tancredo and Pat Buchanan were regular guests on his old CNN show, where he did excellent reporting on George Bush’s North American Union. I even see Tancredo on his Fox show now and then (interesting considering Tancredo is basically retired).

LA replies:

I don’t think you’re correct on that. If he’s conservative on immigration, it’s only on illegal immimgration. On immigration itself, he’s a singer of the song that immigration is good, period.

For example, in March 2010, Ron L. wrote at VFR:

Beck is all over the place. He loves immigration. A few weeks ago, Beck read approvingly Emma Lazarus’s poem, the New Colussus, which redefined the Statue of Liberty in terms of immigration. Far from seeing this as progressive or left-anarchist, Beck loved this idea. He is too ignorant to recognize his liberalism.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at March 19, 2011 09:01 AM | Send

Email entry

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):