Is Kaddafi doomed?
seems to think that Kaddafi is finito
—not just his regime, but his life.
Gaddafi’s Fin de Régime
Posted by Lawrence Auster at February 24, 2011 02:56 PM | Send
The violent demise of the Middle East’s longest-ruling leader—who came to office in September 1969, just a few months after Richard Nixon—stands well outside the mainstream of the region’s politics, but then Moammer Gaddafi always did.
Gaddafi (for the record, the correct spelling of his name is Mu’ammar al-Qadhdhfi) began his rule at the tender age of 27, just as Pan-Arabist ideology was dying down; undeterred, long after others had given up on this fantasy, he remained a proponent of the notion of turning all Arabic countries into one gigantic whole. Eventually frustrated with Arabic-speakers, where the small population of Libya limited his influence, he turned south, where his outsized energy income bestowed real clout in Africa.
Fortunately for the world, every one of his hare-brained schemes came to naught. What I observed in 1981 still holds true: “For all Qadhdhafi’s hyperactivity, he rarely gets his way; empty promises and fanaticism on his part have repeatedly undermined his ceaseless efforts to project power. … Qadhdhafi has won many battles but not a single war.”
How deeply satisfying will it be to watch as a brave and desperate people sweep this eccentric, nasty, and repressive tyrant into the dustbin of history. How gratifying that he has alienated nearly the entire world, even the U.N. Security Council. May his ugly example serve as a permanent warning to other dictators who make war on their populations.
On a personal note: I have watched Gaddafi with interest through the years in part because my career in Middle East studies began coterminous with his rule. Also, he invited me in 2007 to Libya for a one-on-one chat. Although at the time curious about meeting him, in retrospect I am glad I did not. A shower does not cleanse oneself of some encounters. (February 24, 2011)