The principles of liberalism which require the suicide of the white race
In November 2007, a commenter calling herself “African Lady living in the West” wrote:
White people and White civilizations should share their wealth, their knowledge and themselves with the rest of humankind.Another commenter asked:
What obliges the white race to share anything with anyone?To which I replied:
That’s easy: the principle of the equality of the whole human race. That principle arises from a rebellion against what we might call the cosmic facts of life. What are these cosmic facts of life ?Another commenter, Mark J., then replied:
It’s helpful to have the liberal viewpoint stated so clearly: that the highest value is equality of material circumstances. Not excellence, beauty, truth, or freedom. Not the dignity gained by standing on one’s own two feet and working towards the fullest use of whatever talents or gifts you were blessed with, and thus earning respect for your discipline and integrity. No, for liberals the most important thing in the world is that no one have to feel envy towards someone who is doing better than they are. If blacks and browns feel envy, then the white world must do anything necessary—even unto annihilating itself—to remedy that.
You haven’t just described the principles of liberalism, you have shown the utter annihilationist heart of liberalism. Personality at every level must be destroyed. Liberalism is the ideology of the destroyer; whatever it touches, dies.LA replies:
Exactly right: liberalism destroy personality: the personality of a nation (Solzhenitsyn said that nations are distinct personalities), the personality of a civilization, and the personality of individuals.Dan S. writes:
“African Lady living in the West” wrote: “White people and White civilizations should share their wealth, their knowledge and themselves with the rest of humankind.” But isn’t that what is already going on? The West dumps billions of dollars down the assorted third world economic black holes (Haiti being the most recent example), yet we see no inclination of non-Western nations to send their wealth elsewhere (how much did China and Iran give to Haiti?). We also share our knowledge, with our educational institutes full of third world students, many who then go on to use that knowledge against the West (Khalid Sheikh Muhammad and Umar Abdul-Mutallab come to mind). I’m not sure what this “African lady” intends by white people sharing “themselves” with the rest of mankind (no, I will not use the PC term “humankind”), but the white liberal certainly has given over hisr heart, soul, and mind (if not his body) to the assorted third world causes and peoples and has agreed to commit demographic suicide by allowing the masses of the third world to overwhelm the West. The fact of the matter is it is only white people that are “sharing” (more like surrendering) their wealth, knowledge, etc. with the rest of the world.February 19, 1:30 a.m.
Daniela writes from Romania:
By the way, I would like to thank you for the African lady living in the West thing. I read it three times and laughed every time, which was good considering that yesterday was a crappy day. The sad part is that even though she is probably fake because she is too articulate for someone holding those beliefs(I don’t know many liberals who can explain their views that well, especially without calling others racists, fascists and the like), I know people who actually think like that.LA replies:
As I said in the original entry in 2007, I suspect that African Lady is a white male conservative doing a very good parody. However, as you point out, AL’s ideas are indeed held by liberals so it’s valid to reply to them.
Posted by Lawrence Auster at February 18, 2010 12:52 PM | Send