Adding up the score in the climate change debate
In the latest entry on Phil Jones’s BBC interview, a reader writes:
Let’s sum it up this way: in the last few months, virtually every critique of Anthropogenic Global Warming has been shown to be correct, and many of the props of AGW have been demonstrated to be false, in some cases mendacious. Who is “denying science”? Who has been peddling fear? It is not enough to send climate science back to the field to gather data. Some people need to be read out of science entirely, because they have deliberately and fraudulently misused the scientific method for political goals.
Posted by Lawrence Auster at February 17, 2010 12:29 PM | Send