“BNP crisis as Nick Griffin faces jail over whites-only policy”
early September, the British National Party admitted defeat and said it had no choice but to change its ethnically exclusive membership rules to comply with Britain’s anti-discrimination laws. I said
at the time that I thought this outcome was neither surprisng nor damaging to the BNP’s mission. I also strongly reiterated my support for BNP’s exclusive rules, even if they were to have the effect of excluding me.
But now the power-mad British state is turning the screws tighter, not only demanding that the BNP change its constitution by a certain date, but threatening to imprison BNP leader Nick Griffin if the deadline is not met. The story is in the January 10 London Times:
The British National party is facing a crisis in the run-up to the general election after it emerged that Nick Griffin, its leader, could be jailed over its illegal “whites only” membership policy.
Posted by Lawrence Auster at January 12, 2010 11:08 AM | Send
Whitehall officials believe Griffin will be unable to comply in time with a court order forcing him to change the BNP’s constitution to admit Asians, blacks and members of other ethnic minorities.
They say the BNP’s membership is not due to vote on the constitutional change until after the court deadline expires towards the end of this month. Trevor Phillips, head of the government’s equalities watchdog, which won the legal ruling three months ago, has instructed his lawyers to be ready to ask the court to impose crippling sanctions, including a heavy fine or possible jail term against Griffin and Simon Darby, the BNP’s deputy leader.
If successful, the move could paralyse the right-wing party at a time when many at Westminster believe it is on the verge of winning its first seat in parliament with the support of disillusioned former Labour and Tory voters.
Officials question whether the head of a political party who has been imprisoned, fined or has had his assets sequestrated could continue to be its leader.
“The BNP is very much Nick Griffin’s party,” said one official. “Were he forced to stand down three months before an election, then what are the prospects for the party? He could be replaced by someone who was much more hardcore. They would potentially be in disarray.”
The legal action began last year when the Equality and Human Rights Commission issued county court proceedings against Griffin, Darby and Tanya Lumby, another senior BNP official.
The watchdog argued that the BNP’s constitution was unlawful because it restricted membership to particular ethnic groups and those whose skin colour is white.
Last October Judge Paul Collins agreed and awarded costs against the party. Griffin was forced to order a freeze on membership applications. The court gave him until January 28 to persuade the party to change its constitution and allow non-whites to join.
However, Griffin is unlikely to be able to deliver the change in time.
[end of Times article]