York: Dems won’t stop on health care

I and others have said many times that the Democrats are pushing forward to pass the health care bill despite the fact that its passage will doom them in next year’s election, because they think that passing the bill is more important than maintaining their control of Congress. At the same time, there are those who argue that the more negatively the country feels about the bill, the more likely the Democrats will, out of a desire to survive, pull away from it; someone was just making that argument to me last evening. Byron York, formerly of National Review and now of the Washington Examiner, addresses the same question. And his answer is, the Dems will not pull away from the bill, no matter what. According to a Democratic strategist York interviews, the Dems are like bank robbers in the middle of the commission of a bank robbery; whether they stop or proceed, they will still go to jail. So they might as well just complete what they started.

Why Democrats push health care, even if it kills them
Byron York, Chief Political Correspondent
December 15, 2009

To some observers, the Democrats’ race to pass national health care seems irrational—even suicidal. Don’t party leaders understand how much the public opposes the bills currently on the table? Don’t they know that voters are likely to take their revenge at the polls next year? Given that, why do they keep rushing ahead?

Just look at the RealClearPolitics average of polls, which shows that Americans oppose the national health care bills currently on the table by a margin of 53 percent to 38 percent. That’s not just one poll that might tilt right or left, it’s an average of several polls by several pollsters. And the margin of opposition seems to be growing, not diminishing. And yet Democrats seem determined to defy public opinion. Why?

I put the question to a Democratic strategist who asked to remain anonymous. Yes, Democrats certainly understand that voters don’t like the current bills, he told me, and they are fully aware they will probably pay a price next year. But they have found a way to view going ahead anyway as the logical thing to do, at least in their eyes.

You have to look at the issue from three different Democratic perspectives: the House of Representatives, the White House and the Senate.

“In the House, the view of [California Rep. Henry] Waxman and [House Speaker Nancy] Pelosi is that we’ve waited two generations to get health care passed, and the 20 or 40 members of Congress who are going to lose their seats as a result are transitional players at best,” he said. “This is something the party has wanted since Franklin Roosevelt.” In this view, losses are just the price of doing something great and historic. (The strategist also noted that it’s easy for Waxman and Pelosi to say that, since they come from safely liberal districts.)

“At the White House, the picture is slightly different,” he continued. “Their view is, ‘We’re all in on this, totally committed, and we don’t have to run for re-election next year. There will never be a better time to do it than now.’”

“And in the Senate, they look at the most vulnerable Democrats—like [Christopher] Dodd and [Majority Leader Harry] Reid—and say those vulnerabilities will probably not change whether health care reform passes or fails. So in that view, if they pass reform, Democrats will lose the same number of seats they were going to lose before.”

All those scenarios have a certain logic (even if the Senate calculation undercounts the number of potentially vulnerable Democrats). But each scenario is premised on passing an unpopular bill that hurts the party. Even if there’s a strategic rationale for doing it, why are Democrats dead-set on hurting themselves?

“Because they think they know what’s best for the public,” the strategist said. “They think the facts are being distorted and the public’s being told a story that is not entirely true, and that they are in Congress to be leaders. And they are going to make the decision because Goddammit, it’s good for the public.”

Of course, going forward has turned out to be harder than many Democrats thought. And now, with various proposals lying wrecked along the road, the true believers are practicing what the strategist calls “principled damage control.”

But still, does it make sense? In the end, perhaps the most compelling explanation for Democratic behavior is that they are simply in too deep to do anything else. “Once you’ve gone this far, what is the cost of failure?” asks the strategist. [“I am in blood / Stepp’d in so far, that should I wade no more, / Returning were as tedious as go o’er.” Macbeth, Act III, scene 4]

At that point—Republicans will love this—he compared congressional Democrats with robbers who have passed the point of no return in deciding to hold up a bank. Whatever they do, they’re guilty of something. “They’re in the bank, they’ve got their guns out. They can run outside with no money, or they can stick it out, go through the gunfight, and get away with the money.”

That’s it. Democrats are all in. They’re going through with it. Even if it kills them.

Byron York, The Examiner’s chief political correspondent, can be contacted at byork@washingtonexaminer.com.

- end of initial entry -

Karl D. writes:

I agree that the Dems will not stop on health care. It fits in so well with their suicidal Liberal script. If they crash and burn so be it. They will see themselves as martyrs to the cause. Health care suicide jihadis if you will. “There is no healthcare but our healthcare, and Obama is great.” BOOM.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at December 15, 2009 09:14 AM | Send

Email entry

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):