The news they’ll never print
was forced to throw his spiritual mentor Jeremiah Wright under a bus, so he hired Son of Jeremiah Wright to run a top government program.
The information on the pro-Mumia album that Obama “green jobs” czar Van Jones produced and performed on was provided at Gateway Pundit:
Here are a few of the lines from hate-filled anti-white, anti-American, anti-Israeli recording by Van Jones and the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights:
Various Singers-Poets: The American way, manufactuered by these white folks in office. By these rich men here to mock us. The United States is a stolen land led by right-wing, war hungry, oil thirsty. And when it’s all said and done they still can’t clean their own place because they got people of color playing servant to do that sh*t for them… The true terrorists are made in the US, in this police state… The US is a crack-fiend for oil. And they’re ready to rape, kill, assault, rob anybody and everybody…
Bombing babies in the night. Two wrongs don’t make a right… The US needs to exit its colonies in Iraq, in the region and finally in Israel.
Van Jones: At this point. The end of the occupation. The right of return of the Palestinian people. These are critical dividing lines in human rights. We have to be here. No American would put up with an Israeli-style occupation of their hometown for 53 days let alone 54 years. US tax dollars are funding violence against people of color inside the US borders and outside the US borders.
Of course that’s just one bit of Van Jones’s record.
But now consider the New York Times antiseptic
piece making it seem as if Jones was brought down by Republican attacks rather than by his own record. The lead sentence is:
In a victory for Republicans and the Obama administration’s conservative critics, Van Jones resigned as the White House’s environmental jobs “czar” on Saturday.
Meaning that normal, objective people, like the writers and editors of the Times
, have no problem with a person of Van Jones’ radical record having a White House post. Only mean conservatives do.
Here is Michelle Malkin’s roundup on the story.
A. Zarkov writes:
Special Adviser for Green Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation, Van Jones, has been forced to resign his position at the White House Council on Environmental Quality pretty much from “thunder on the right.” I first heard about Van Jones from Michael Savage who brought him up months ago. Then recently (without attribution) Glenn Beck grabbed the ball and ran with it exposing Van Jones for what he is: anti-white, anti-American, pro-communist, and a raving lunatic on energy. He called Republicans a**holes and said that “black students would have never committed a massacre such as the one at Colorado’s Columbine High School.” He said, “The white polluters and the white environmentals are essentially steering poison into the people of colored communities.” Glenn Beck has collected these gems here [link is lost]. However what actually seems to have brought him down was his signature on a 911Truth.org petition. In a true Orwellian fashion Van Jones said the Sept. 11 petition “certainly does not reflect my views, now or ever.”
From today’s Wall Street Journal:
“Mr. Jones’ resignation, in the dead of night over Labor Day weekend, marks the first time one of the numerous conservative campaigns raging against the Obama administration has drawn decisive blood.”
The mainstream media ignored Van Jones, but talk radio and the conservative blogosphere seems to have scored their first hit on the previously invulnerable Obama administration complex. A minor victory to be sure, but another sign of the Obama melt down.
- end of initial entry -
Richard S. writes:
Is it possible, just possible, that this exposure to black rule—for that’s what Obama and his boy Jones amount to when all is said and done—will cure whites of the guilt vote compulsion? Needless to say the millions of whites who voted “historically” will never verbalize the lesson that rule by blacks is catastrophic; but will they have internalized the lesson, will they have truly learned it? I have no illusions that whites will not once more flirt with leftism. That lesson they never learn. But I pray they have been cured of the black thing. For at least a generation
We don’t know, we can’t know. We can only observe what happens. It has to make some difference in whites’ understanding of reality. We can hope that it makes a lot of differences.
But leaving aside the lessons about blacks and black rule, one thing is sure: the myth of Obama, the divine nimbus of Obama, has been dissipated. A lot of whites have to be undergoing a cold awakening now, after the insane hopes they placed in him. This is all for the good.
Among all the scenarios we discussed at VFR last year about what kind of president he would be, I don’t remember if this scenario was suggested: that he would indeed be a radical left president, but that that he would also be spectacularly incompetent at it, for example, telling lies so blatant (“you won’t lose your present insurance program,” “nationalized health will fix the economy”) that the whole country including liberals recognizes them as lies even as he’s speaking them, and yet he goes on speaking them.
My big doubt last year was the contradiction between his leftism and his desire to be loved and accepted by everyone. He couldn’t have both. If he went left, he would arouse the opposition of half the country; if he sought to be loved by everyone, he couldn’t be leftist. He chose the first, big time.
Paul K. writes:
Imagine the gall of Van Jones to Say,”black students would have never committed a massacre such as the one at Colorado’s Columbine High School.”
Jones must have thought long and hard to come up with a category of violence in which blacks do not dominate, and then had the gall to throw that out as evidence of their moral superiority. Does he really want to open up a public discussion on the different rates of violence between the races? Of course not. Black radicals delight in making stupid, taunting statements like this, knowing that no one dares to hold them accountable. t
Jake Jacobsen writes:
Paul K. writes:
Posted by Lawrence Auster at September 06, 2009 07:27 PM | Send
“Jones must have thought long and hard to come up with a category of violence in which blacks do not dominate, and then had the gall to throw that out as evidence of their moral superiority.”
Of course needless to say Mr. Jones maintains blacks almost perfect allergy to telling the truth and/or statistics on the subject of black violence and crime rates…
Of the 24,950 juveniles ages 12 - 17 who were murdered between 1980 and 2000, 12,880 (52%) were black and 11,270 (46%) were white. The remaining 620 murder victims were American Indian, Alaska Native, Asian, or Pacific Islander. See this.
In 2005, homicide victimization rates for blacks were 6 times higher than the rates for whites.
In 2005, offending rates for blacks were more than 7 times higher than the rates for whites
From 1976 to 2005—
61.6% of black murder victims died in drug-related circumstances
- 86% of white victims were killed by whites
- 94% of black victims were killed by blacks
Like almost every other category crime blacks excel at killing each other, whites and whoever else is foolish enough to wander into their path. This is why it is so critical for us to separate ourselves out from violent blacks!