Why the (obvious and necessary) expedient of deportation is taboo

A reader explains why, for all the talk today about the threat of Islamization, Mark Steyn and other critics of Islam never mention the possibility of removing even some Muslims from the West: they are still controlled by the fear of seeming Nazi-like. Another reader turns this conventional wisdom on its head and says that it is the Muslims who are the Nazis, while we traditionalist defenders of the West are the anti-Nazis.

A reader writes:

With respect to Steyn: I think there is a deep unspoken fear among Western elites that if Europe and the West actually began to reassert their traditional identity, we would automatically all turn into Nazis (which is garbage). Telling foreigners (especially Muslims) that they must leave the West and go back to their traditional homelands is not the same as rounding people up into camps and killing them. Again, the deep fear is that Nazism (or some kind of murderous white supremacist movement)will arise. Hitler did a good job of ruining Europe and the West, and his ghost still haunts us to this day. His name and his cause are used to smear anyone who attempts to assert a traditional Western identity. If we are to reassert our identity we must do so in a controlled and DEFENSIVE fashion. Defending our people and our traditional civilization is not a choice, it is an obligation.

A conservative reader from Sweden writes:

The cause of Hitler is being used to smear anyone who attempts to assert a traditional Western identity, quite as said.

It’s time to set the things straight about who the real Nazis are, as well as the real Nazi collaborators. Hitler was the first European Islamist. Islam should always be called Arabic Nazism in order to set things straight in the eyes of the Westerners. The often used term ‘Islamo-fascism’ is a euphemism. By adding ‘fascism’ it makes Islam relatively nicer. Mussolini was many things, but never an Islamist.

Now it’s clear that the Michael Moore and Cindy Sheehan leftists are Arabic-Nazi collaborators. The Bush Administration corresponds effectively to the Chamberlain War Ministry fighting this war without spirit. We are in the phase of the Phony War (September 1939 to May 1940), and no Churchill has appeared yet on the stage.

Arabic Nazism is the original Nazism. Hitler was a plagiarist. But now when we’ve got Nazis with a darker skin complexion and this time they’re living among us, it’s as if God wants to try us in some sort of ultimate test. Trying not only our faith but also our intelligence. Did we learn anything from history really?

Islam should be called Arabic Nazism every single day from now on. This will make it clear that it’s the liberals smearing and opposing Western self-assertion that are the Nazi collaborators. And the Orwellian kind.

The true nature of Islam is already known to Westerners as Nazism. Let’s speak a language that people already know. Islam is the ideology of Arabic imperialism, it’s Arabic Nazism. Repeat: Arabic Nazism.

As I’ve said myself, the way to understand Muhammad is that he was a successful Hitler. There is a lot to chew on in that statement.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at January 03, 2006 08:06 PM | Send