A few L-dotters disgusted with Bush for embracing Clinton

Today at FrontPage Magazine, Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey have an article reminding the world of what Clinton did to them (forced fondling of Kathleen Willey in the White House, and, according to Broaddrick’s detailed, completely believable, and never refuted story, the violent rape of Broaddrick in a Little Rock hotel room). In the comments at Lucianne.com about the article, which of course were mostly about Clinton, I was gratified to see a handful of L-dotters excoriating, not Clinton, but the two presidents Bush for befriending and legitimizing him, showing that, among Republicans, the moral sense has not yet been completely replaced by partisan cheerleading.

Reply 7—Posted by: chatham, 10/25/2005 9:59:48 AM
I put a large part of the blame on Pres. Bush for putting this Clinton Jerk back in the public eye and showing him as a great citizen .

Reply 33—Posted by: GeneSmith, 10/25/2005 1:28:38 PM
I know President Bush is supposed to be a Born-Again Nice Guy but it’s way past time to stop the Nice Guy crap and string Slick Willie up. Surely there’s some evidence that the Clinton’s stooges didn’t shred that could stand up in court.

Reply 46—Posted by: paiso, 10/25/2005 7:44:57 PM
I guess it never occurred to some that President Bush is following Don Corleone’s sage advice about keeping your enemies close. Clinton was going to get the spotlight and the MSM lovefest no matter what. At least, there is some element of control over when as Clinton is not in the news as much as he would like.

Reply 61—Posted by: Lexy, 10/26/2005 8:37:56 AM
besides our borders, I get MOST UPSET with Pres Bush over Clinton…..why the HECK does he keep kissing up to him and why does his Dad?? The Clintons knife him in the back every chance they get, but Pres Bush NEVER gets out there and rants on Clintons part in 9-11 or the fact we are eaten up with terrorists in our own country … To me, it makes Pres Bush look weak and foolish and silly…..

Reply 72—Posted by: kanphil, 10/26/2005 12:59:25 PM
Somebody should send this article to President Bush. Maybe it would help convince him to stop putting Slick out in front of the public with his apparent imprimatur. Perhaps the President thinks he is exercising the virtue of Christian charity, but it is wrong, wrong, wrong.

“Besides our borders, I get MOST UPSET with Pres Bush over Clinton…” This mirrors my reasons for not voting for Bush in 2000. The two decisive issues for me were the National Question, and the Clinton corruption. Bush was on the wrong side on the first, and an evader on the second. If he had been on the right side of even one of those two issues, I would have voted for him, but he wasn’t, so I didn’t. Furthermore, Bush has gotten flagrantly worse on both issues over the last five years. On the National Question, even I was astonished at his plan—which he has pushed relentlessly despite widespread opposition in his own party—to welcome into the United States everyone in the world who can underbid an American for a job; and, on the other issue, he went from being a mere evader of the Clinton problem to being an embracer of Clinton.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at October 26, 2005 07:54 PM | Send