The birth of Frankistan

There is an endless supply of bad news in the world today, and in no place is the news as bad or the supply as endless as in France, or, as it might be called, Frankistan, that sinister, half-dead, half-alive political entity that is being created even as we speak through the unnatural joining together of the body parts of the dying French nation and the metastasizing Moslem world. In a very disturbing article at FrontPage Magazine, Olivier Guitta, who appears to be some kind of journalist though he doesn’t give his affiliation or his nationality, describes how the French government allows radical Moslem tv stations from Moslem countries, including the Hezbolah channel, to broadcast in France, freely venting their support for 9/11, their support for bin Laden, their genocidal hatred of Jews and America, and so on. Meanwhile, the French authorities only try to contain these pro-terrorist programs (as well as the immigrant imams who echo the same message, and 80 percent of whom are funded by Saudi Arabia) in the most piecemeal and unserious way. The sense you get is of a France that, in the ultimate fulfilment of its long national career of appeasement, is surrendering to the jihadist conquest as rapidly as it can. Verily, verily, the Western world is in very, very serious trouble.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at June 15, 2004 10:44 PM | Send
    
Comments

And simultaneously, look what they did to Brigitte Bardot.

Posted by: Allan Wall on June 15, 2004 11:48 PM

Indeed, Mr. Wall. Frankistan (or Frogistan, as I’ve seen it named) seems to give us the perfect case study of what happens when liberalism runs unchecked. Yes, I know that Le Pen and a couple of others are there - but they never garner a large enough share of the vote to unseat the Tranzis - or even slow down the pace of destruction.

As with the Bardot case mentioned below, here we have yet another example of the racial double standard. Neo-Nazi parties are explicitly outlawed in France and other EU nations. Internet sites like VDARE are often blocked because they are “racist.” Holocaust deniers are prosecuted, and their books are censored, Yet virulent rabid anti-Semitism is permitted for Muslims - because they are the “other.”

At the same time, French people cannot express any desire to even save their own nation without risking trial. When the proposal is made to mention the historical importance of Christianity in the EU constitution, it’s rejected outright. Total gun control is in place - except for gangs of the “oppressed”, who even carry out bank robberies with RPG’s in France. What we are witnessning is astonishing - a majority of people are committing mass suicide. It’s like Jonestown Guyana all over again - everyone will be free and equal in death.

Posted by: Carl on June 16, 2004 12:19 AM

This contrasts greatly with a story told me by a visiting French grad student about 15 years ago. A couple of decades earlier a French-language broadcast tower in Brittany had been blown up. The blame was put on Breton separatists, and their movement lost sympathy for quite a long time. The student said information had recently leaked out that the French government had blown up the tower itself! They were that cynical— and that patriotic. (And unlike the case with the Mussulman influx, the French were the outsiders.)

Actually, I think it better that the most vitriolic beurs are given a forum. So much the better if they crowd the assimilationists out. Because the former are instructive, while the latter are truly dangerous.

And the same goes with Mexican irredentists. Samuel Huntington’s new book was greeted in the most recent New Republic with the most scandalous, virulent , dangerous moderation I’ve seen in a long time. Someone, stop them!

Posted by: Reg Cæsar on June 16, 2004 12:20 AM

Oh, and irony upon ironies, the major French patriot of the day, Jean-Marie le Pen, is a Breton!

Posted by: Reg Cæsar on June 16, 2004 12:21 AM

Ordinarily my reaction would have been: To hell with them, thet got what they deserve. But Frogs have nukes and other world class military technologies. It is interesting to know if DoD and/or CIA have any plans to deal with nuke-armed Moslem terrorists supporting nation at the center of EU.

I bet Politicial Correctness prevents prudent planning for that possibility/eventuality.

If we were serious, and we are not, CIA would have pumped a lot of cash in small unmarked banknotes to Le Pen and friends, would be frantically looking for agents of influence among French Jews and French nationalists, etc.

French army is probably penetrated deeply by Moslems and Africans but secret services might be in a better shape. They can be convinced to make an attempt to wake up their nation. The problem is they might reproduce that Breton “accident” or KGB blowing up apartment buildings and blaming Chechens.

But reality is nothing will be done till French will give nukes to Arabs or something equally drastic.

Posted by: Mik on June 16, 2004 1:34 AM

It used to be that the Western countries were called “Christendom”. Like it or not, “Christendom” is now in the ash heap of History. Without “Christendom”, the Western countries have no cultural, philosophic, or spiritual defense against Islamic invaders.

What, then, does the future hold? An interesting optimistic idea is presented in The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity, by Philip Jenkins.

Preview it on Amazon.com.

Posted by: Arie Raymond on June 16, 2004 11:03 AM

I agree with Mik. Something drastic will have to be done, but it will more likely be done, I believe, by patriotic Frenchmen risking their lives (sound like an impossibility, right?). The CIA and our mitlitary have enough to contend with with N. Korea and China. Interesting how few have commented on the nuclear threat from Pakistan. Musharaff coud be gone tomorrow, and then what? Our Special Forces were unable to locate their nukes during the Afghanistan invasion, and I haven’t heard a peep since.

But an Islamic controlled France would pose a nuclear threat would, as opposed to N. Korea, pose a nuclear threat to our East Coast. This of course would be many years off. Knowing Americans as I do, we will plan for such things after we are unable to stop them, as has happened in N. Korea.

Bush has made many mistakes in his 3.5 years, but letting N. Korea get away with nukes and with threatening us is unforgivable. His other huge mistake is in letting Iran produce nukes while our troops are right next door. Is he waiting for Israel to attack Iran instead?

Posted by: David Levin on June 16, 2004 9:17 PM

Mr. Levin,
How is Bush to deal with Norht Korea, if South Korea and China refuse to allow an attack on North Korea?

Posted by: RonL on June 17, 2004 2:56 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?





Email entry

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):