GOP head gets grilled for meeting with Human Rights Campaign

The Red Map Strikes Back. Leaders of America’s top social-conservative organizations gave Republican National Committee chairman Marc Racicot the third degree over his earlier meeting with the Human Rights Campaign, the country’s largest gay rights group. Racicot, a former governor, after defending himself by saying that he would “meet with anyone,” admitted he may have been “naïve” about the goals and methods of the homosexual rights movement. Here is a blow-by-blow account of Racicot’s session with the conservatives.

Posted by Lawrence Auster at May 11, 2003 07:10 PM | Send
    
Comments

White House strikes back at Red Map. They did it again.

White House Confers With GOP Gays
NewsMax.com
Sunday, May 11, 2003
The highlight of the Log Cabin Republicans’ annual convention was a meeting Friday between senior White House officials and the membership of the gay group – at a time of open dissension in the ranks over the GOP’s stance on gay rights and same-sex marriages.
With longtime GOP activist Paul Weyrich, head of the Washington-based Free Congress Foundation and others warning that Republicans could lose the votes of the party’s conservative base if it weakens or changes its stand on key social issues — including its opposition to gay rights and same-sex marriages — the briefing at the Old Executive Office Building adjacent to the White House capped a three day event that included talks on gays in the military, a tour of the Capitol and a reception for members of Congress, according to the New York Times.

Although conferees at the White House briefing played down any ideological battles ongoing in the party, in an earlier address to the group, Rich Galen, a Republican strategist, remarked about what he perceived as a double standard: “In America in 2003, you can’t say bad things about African-Americans, but you can still say bad things about gays.”

Posted by: Gary on May 11, 2003 9:26 PM

The links to other articles in the sidebar of the article Mr. Auster links, notably the one about “pedophilia chic,” are worth following.

Posted by: Jim Kalb on May 12, 2003 1:35 PM

I followed Mr. Kalb’s lead and read that “chic” article. Disturbing just isn’t the word. I’m old enough to remember a day when predicting that the country’s moral decline would lead to results like this would have one lampooned as paranoid and conspiracy-minded.

Here it is.

As a Christian, I expect the world to descend lower and lower until judgment. Still, when I think about whether and if things could turn around, when we’re reaching a point like this, I wonder just what it would take. It seems like it would require measures too drastic to contemplate. I guess that’s another topic for another day.

Posted by: Joel on May 15, 2003 8:48 PM

Like Joel, I also wonder just what it really would take for large numbers of people to come to their senses. If hijacked airliners being flown into skyscrapers isn’t enough to cause some to at least question the direction we’ve been headed in, what on earth would? I see little evidence of any significant change among ordinary Americans. They seem as clueless and accepting of the poison they are fed each day as during the Clinton years. The leftist/liberal hydra marches on with only rear-guard opposition here and there - it continues on its evil path even in the red state places.

Posted by: Carl on May 16, 2003 12:37 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?





Email entry

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):