Frum’s double standard on racial atonement

Regarding Trent Lott’s inadvertent endorsement of the 1948 Dixiecrat platform, David Frum worries that in order keep his job as Republican leader, Lott will have to surrender to the liberal and black agenda in Congress. Thus Democratic Senator Joseph Lieberman has demanded that Lott must “make clear his commitment to racial equality, [must] meet directly with the members of the Congressional Black Caucus and show that he understands the hurt his comments have caused.” Another Democrat proposed that Lott earn forgiveness by backing an increase in the minimum wage and federal housing programs, and an expansive prescription drug benefit. And there are several other racially charged issues coming up in the next two years, like welfare reform and racial preferences, that Frum thinks will also be compromised by Lott’s need to “pay” for his indiscretion.

As I was reading about Frum’s concerns, I suddenly remembered something he said a few years ago, that America’s history of racial discrimination obligates it to maintain large scale nonwhite immigration. But if our past racial sins require us to commit national suicide for the sake of minorities, as Frum evidently believes, then, by his own logic, why shouldn’t Lott’s racial indiscretion require him to go along with a little pro-minority log-rolling? Why does Frum support racial atonement in the one case and oppose it in the other? Or, to put it another way, why does he care more about defending the conservative agenda in Congress than he does about preserving America’s very existence as a distinct nation and culture?
Posted by Lawrence Auster at December 13, 2002 03:15 AM | Send


Haven’t several California Democratic party officials said something like, “California is going to become a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn’t like it should leave.”

Has Mr. Frum had any objections to this?

Posted by: David on December 13, 2002 2:11 PM

The divine Michelle Malkin weighs in on the Lott/Thurmond affair, making more explicit a few of the points people have been discussing:

Posted by: Unadorned on December 14, 2002 11:31 AM

For any who may be interested, Steve Sailer has a ton of Lott stuff posted on his blog-site, at It’s first-rate stuff, all of it, including the readers’ e-mails he posted. I happen to agree one hundred percent with Steve’s take on this whole affair.

Posted by: Unadorned on December 14, 2002 9:23 PM
Post a comment

Email Address:



Remember info?

Email entry

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):