The hideous truth of antiwhite America

During the recent sniper horror, I could not get over the fact that the perpetrator was able to shoot his victims in broad daylight in built-up urban and highway areas and keep escaping with no one seeing him clearly, let along stopping him. I obsessed on the subject, saying over and over that I just couldn’t understand how the shooter could pull this off. It seemed uncanny, almost superhuman.

And now we know the ugly truth. The answer was not that the shooters were protected from arrest by some extraordinary talent of their own, but that they were protected from arrest by the fact that they were black. Paul Sperry’s article at World Net Daily makes it devastatingly clear that the police, regardless of all evidence to the contrary, were under orders from the antiwhite ideologue Chief Moose only to stop white males. The failure to apprehend the killers was as simple—and as gross—as that.
Posted by Lawrence Auster at November 11, 2002 11:46 PM | Send
    

Comments

Moose is a complete incompetent. I read the Sperry piece last week plus a fine article by Ilana Mercer the week before covering the antics of this idiot. What is most striking is how an ebonic-speaking bureaucratic microbe like Moose has a lucrative career in law enforcement fighting the “evil of racial profiling” and then proceeds to impose racial profiling based on his own personal bigotry (as opposed to actual statistical likelihood). The flagrant hypocrasy of the left never ceases to amuse.

Posted by: Carl on November 12, 2002 2:23 AM

Once again it is a case of political correctness kills. At some point sensible people are going to have to confront this phenomenon because the bodies are beginning to stack up.

Posted by: Charles Rostkowski on November 12, 2002 10:15 AM

America would be a better country if all the whites were to go back to europe where they came from. They are the least civilized race of people.

I could list all the pain and suffering that these disgusting caucasians have inflicted on the world, but I don’t have time. We need a president of color so that he/she can deport these cracker/aryan fucks back to germany, italy, england, spain, ect.

Posted by: arun ramani on April 16, 2004 5:41 AM

Pain and suffering? Like the language you’re writing in? Like cell phones? Like airplanes? Like civil society? Perhaps European Americans should learn from the Indians and create a class of sub-human untouchables, or begin gang raping Pakistani women. Perhaps then they’ll truly learn to be civlized. Namaste.

Posted by: Damon on April 16, 2004 10:17 AM

Normally I don’t allow obscenity and racial threats at VFR, but I’ll leave arun ramani’s comment up for a while as evidence of a certain kind of mentality.

Posted by: Lawrence Auster on April 16, 2004 10:42 AM

ARUN RAMANI IS A COMPLETE MORAN. I guess this means I am a racist. Why doesn’t Top Ramani go back to the country of color that he is from?

As for a president of color who would be the best choice? Al Sharpton? Remember what he did to Pagones and Tawana Brawley? Oh’ How about the Reverend Jesse Jackson? What church is he a reverend of? Is Rerun Top Ramani a member of the children of Israel or some other cult that blames all the self inflicted wounds on the white race.

With Rramani everything is conspiracy theory. It is because of the white race that 85% of the prison population is black.

Look at the language he likes to use. I’m sorry that is not his fault that he is “unemadumacted” it is because of the whiteman. Please inform us on nations of color where they are progressive? Haiti? Ghana? Uganda?

Posted by: BILL CLARK on April 16, 2004 10:53 AM

You fucking white assholes stole this land from the Natives. THIS IS NOT YOUR COUNTRY. The same way South Africa was not your country. When I said ‘uncivilized’, I meant of all the massacre you people committed aginst the natives in America, South Africa, and India. I don’t mean things like airplanes and cell phones. Civil society? You jerks had the nerves to say “all men are created equal”, while owning slaves in your back yards? If hypocrasy is civil, then I’d rather not be civil. If barging into other people’s country and suppressing them for no reason, considering other, PEACEFUL races do not owe anything to this kind of treatment, is civil, then count me out. You degenerates invented racism. Aw the civility. As far as me knowing English, I like to use what we’ve been taught against my enemies. It’s fun to bite the hands that feed you. I love America. If you can stay where you don’t belong, then I can stay where “I don’t belong.”

To rid the world of evil is to rid the world of the white race.

yours,

Arun Ramani

Posted by: arun on April 16, 2004 1:18 PM

In reply to Mr. Ramani, I would consider going back to where my ancestors came from, but there is one big problem. The more I read of history, the more I see that every land was conquered by outsiders many times over in its history. And who knows how many unrecorded conquests there were in the prehistory of a given land? Thus, everywhere I look, I am not one of the original inhabitants of that land. Nor is Mr. Ramani an original inhabitant of any land.

I guess we will all just have to make the best of the world as it exists today, with its funny national borders and so on.

Posted by: Clark Coleman on April 16, 2004 1:34 PM

Expanding on Mr. Coleman’s point, we could say that every single person on earth is the descendant of conquerors. After all, only the fittest survive, right? Ironically, our culture touts Darwinism, which says that only those species and sub-species that displace others survive, yet in the political realm we treat the competitive success of human groups as a horrible crime.

Posted by: Lawrence Auster on April 16, 2004 1:42 PM

The Celts and the Basques were marginalized in Europe, the Maoris abused the Moriori, the Bantu spread out to Africa slaughtering the San (and continue to cannibalize the Pygmies as well as each other), the Aryans invaded India, the cro-Magnons overtook the poor squat Neadertals. Who abolished slavery? Who spread a religion that paved the way for individual rights? True, that last one has been a mixed blessing but these positive things have to count for something.
Also, I wish to retract my statement about cell phones. There is no doubt they should be placed under pain and suffering.

Posted by: Damon on April 16, 2004 2:10 PM

“Also, I wish to retract my statement about cell phones. There is no doubt they should be placed under pain and suffering.”

Amen.

Posted by: Lawrence Auster on April 16, 2004 2:14 PM

Arun can always give his inheritance to an Indian tribe. I always wondered why more white liberals don’t do that.

Ah, the sainted Indians. When they raped and kidnapped white pioneer women, was that “for a good cause?”

Posted by: roach on April 16, 2004 2:31 PM

Ramani is so eloquent with words. His blatant ignorance is so obvious. I think maybe if he had a little more than a 3rd grade education he could be a little more rational. But forgive us ” The White Man” for giving you Carte Blanche on everthing in this country. If you can’t stand it here leave and go find peace!!!!!

Posted by: Bill Clark on April 16, 2004 2:33 PM

I think that we should thank whoever invented pre-paid cell phones.
These phones are useful in that they allow one to talk on the phone anywhere when they need to, but that buying minutes is expensive enough so that it discourages people from talking all the time as they do on normal cell phones.

Posted by: Michael Jose on April 16, 2004 2:51 PM

I have a pre-paid cell phone for emergency use and other non-routine uses. No chatting while driving; no chatting while not driving, for that matter. 150 minutes lasts for several months.

I was walking to my car the other day and a girl at a bus stop was talking loudly on a cell phone. She was standing there by herself, seemingly unaware that she was shouting to the whole world. For a moment, I had a deja vu recollection of working in downtown Dallas, Texas, years ago, and seeing the occasional lunatic variety of homeless person standing on the sidewalk, talking loudly to himself. I wonder if the cell phone addicts ever realize the similar image they present in public?

Sorry for the off topic discussion.

Posted by: Clark Coleman on April 16, 2004 3:07 PM

I agree, actually I went into a cigar shop yesterday and the sign on the door said no cell phone talking when inside our store. Please put your phone on vibrate and kindly take the conversation outside.

The other thing I can’t stand is when you are talking person to person and a person on a cell phone looks at you to quiet down so they can talk on their phone.

Posted by: Bill Clark on April 16, 2004 3:11 PM

To react to Bill, I am not going anywhere. In this free society, I have the right to be prejudice aginst white people if I want to. I love America. I just hate white people. If you were literate, you would have understood that in my letter. I forgot to mention, you people built the H-Bomb. Now that’s civility. Why don’t you get back on the Mayflower and go back to England, Bill.

Posted by: arun ramani on April 16, 2004 7:21 PM

Arun’s political philosophy is interesting. Let me see if I understand:

(1) He’s made it clear that he’s very, very upset about “racism”, but he’s also convinced that all the evil in the world is due to the existence of a particular race of people and would like to “rid the world” of them.

(2) He loves America, but he hates the people who built it and thinks it would have been better if they had never come here in the first place.

(3) He thinks whites are especially evil because they stole land from others, but he doesn’t feel any guilt about occupying that stolen land himself.

Might this be evidence that there really are “pre-logical” cultures? Or maybe it’s the wisdom of the Mysterious East I’ve heard so much about - embracing contradiction and so on. (Incidentally, I’m curious about the etymology of the name “Arun”. Is there any connection to the word “Aryan”, by chance? Maybe Arun himself, being a highly “literate” guy, will be able to enlighten me here…)

Posted by: Julien on April 17, 2004 2:48 AM

I have never seen a site like this before. It has overturned my ideas about humanity and informed me about the level of hate people feel against each other. It is shocking and horrible. There are good people and bad people in every race - whites perpretrated a lot of crimes against other races, terrible crimes. History would indicate that man is innately aggressive, and so accept that and try to live together as best you can. The world is changing fast and there is no such thing as a country where only one race lives. I am a white European female and my country has never oppressed another country, but if there was a reason, it may well have. Tolerance is the key. Your anger is misdirected, misplaced - vent it somewhere, just don’t let it make you rot.

Posted by: Karen on June 17, 2004 8:55 AM

Could Karen give any examples of the “shocking and horrible … hate” she finds at this thread or this site, other than that of the white-hating Arun?

Posted by: Lawrence Auster on June 17, 2004 9:28 AM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?





Email entry

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):