Pym Fortuyn’s Legacy

The spirit of slain Dutch leader Pym Fortuyn lives on. Dutch police announced Tuesday the arrest and impending deportation of 210 illegal aliens, all from the Balkans. Close to 6,000 illegal aliens have been deported from the Netherlands this year, according to officials. The new government elected in the wake of Fortuyn’s assassination says it plans to reduce immigration by 25% in its first year. Of course, the usual suspects are crying foul.
Posted by at September 24, 2002 11:53 PM | Send
    
Comments

It’s about time the Netherlands stood up for their roots and race. Many great Hollanders lives were put into making Holland a great country today, but few, if any, drops of that country-building sweat came from out Morrocco, nor Turkey. And greatness did not spread from the price of mosques turned into churches. Supposing Dutch people, numbering but 1/10th of the total immigrants from any one country found to be in Holland, were to reside in that country, they’d become targets of a state-sponsored onslaught! Guranteed.
But can the Dutch handle it when they eventually trace back the guilder-money-trail leading to… the Hashassins, Hashemite asassins?? back to Abdul Aziz, to Wahabi families, King Faisel? King Hussan of Morrocco? Who else??

Posted by: Eddi Pend on February 26, 2003 9:37 PM

Eddi, I say Bravo to you! Bravo! and Bravo! and Bravo!

Posted by: Unadorned on February 26, 2003 10:18 PM

Every person of European origin should feel indebted to Pym Fortuyn for his efforts and martyrdom.

I am a European immigrant to Canada, having been in the country for 31 years. In these 31 years, I have witnessed the transformation of Canada from a basically European-based country into a not-exclusively-European mixture of races and cultures. This is especially true in the city I reside in, Toronto, which is the most important in the country.

I, for one, never emigrated to this country to live among people of different cultures and races, against whom I feel no animosity on a personal basis. I thought I was coming to a European-based culture.

This country is being transformed - to my and others displeasure - by its Liberal (read leftist, politically correct) government.

This seems to be a malaise of the times, in which governments in the Western world are DELIBERATELY transforming the core of what made these countries great (read the case of the Netherlands.) This transformation is being brought about by mostly liberal-left governments and attitude. Their reasoning for this seems to be their self-perpetuation, since the new immigrants will be voting for the party (Liberal, in Canada’s case) that let them into the country. The effects on the established culture (European) are apparently of no interest to them. The new society is to be one of multi-culturalism, in which everybody takes advantage of the consumer society, and there is no particular racial or cultural identity. He or she who dissents is being branded as “racist”, and therefore undesirable, subject to the severest penalties of the law. In other words, this seems to be the greatest conspiracy of all time, and trust me, I’m a well balanced person, not given to conspiracy theories.

I am sure glad that Holland for one is awakening to this situation and intends to curtail it. I feel there is a big backlash on the part of Europeans everywhere to stand up to this onslaught on our culture, and the world we grew up in. I’m one of them.

Posted by: WA on December 31, 2003 4:59 AM

I hope that as the people of Europe awaken, they realize that it’s not just enough to slow or stop the tide of non-European immigration, but to _reverse_ it.

Posted by: Lawrence Auster on December 31, 2003 6:38 AM

Lawrence,

I just read the material of your talk: “Mass Immigration and its Effects on Our Culture: Why are Mainstream Conservatives Silent.” Congratulations, this is the best analysis I’ve seen to date on the problem of massive immigration to America and the West.

Whenever I’ve asked white Canadians why Canada was allowing massive non-European immigration into Canada, I’ve been given replies like “I don’t believe we should discriminate” and “We cannot be racist.” This confirms your statement that the problem is a (by now) built-in WAY OF THINKING in people of all political persuations, where standing up for your race and way of life is intrinsically evil and un-Christian. This is, of course, constantly re-inforced by the media and government to the point that one questions his own “racist” motivations.

Well, I for one am sick of hearing this harmful garbage, while the culture and the people I grew up with are becoming more and more an ODDITY where they live. I intend to stand up for our race and culture. I can no longer stand by the sidelines while our cherished European culture is washed down the drain. The only solution I see is to constantly fight political correctness at every step, as I intend to.

Regards,
WA

Posted by: WA on January 10, 2004 1:32 PM

WA is making sense. Christianity is only a millenniums long dupe on the gentile anyway. What is with all that “love your enemy” nonsense anyway? White people need to start looking into traditional European religions and ways of thinking. Get it straight people, you are not racist for preferring your own culture instead of a foriegn and alien one. Can you imagine going to Japan and calling the Japanese racist if they wanted to practice Buddhism and speak Japanese and eat traditional Japanese food? Of course they want to do that, they are Japanese. There is nothing wrong with loving your own people and culture. Anyone who tells you otherwise is EVIL.

Posted by: Goy Genius on January 10, 2004 2:27 PM

Thanks, Goy, that’s a good example about the Japanese. I personally feel I have been left no CHOICE but to act in the behalf of the white man. The age of the MILITANT WHITE MAN must come. The white man must stand up for his rights before it’s too late.

Posted by: WA on January 10, 2004 2:55 PM

Dear WA,

You sound like one of the few people who has been able to take the blinders off. A modern miracle. I should mention not to talk about violence or Mr. Auster will pull out the red pen. ;-)

Working toward a brighter tomorrow,

Goy Genius

Posted by: Goy Genius on January 10, 2004 3:01 PM

I appreciate what WA said about my article. However, “militant white man” could be taken to be a call for vigilante action or something of that nature. I think it would be better to speak of being a “principled white man,” a description that implies a loyalty to the white race and courage in defending it, but also a belief in moral principles that transcend race.

Goy Genius asks: “What is with all that “love your enemy” nonsense anyway?”

It is important to remember is that the teachings of the New Testament are not a guide to the conduct of nations and the organization of political society. They are a guide to finding the kingdom of heaven. When this is not understood, not only are the results catastrophic for society (because Christian principles applied indiscriminately in the political sphere are a formula for collective suicide), but that very catastrophe results in the further catastrophe of people rejecting Christianity outright, as is happening today on the racialist right. What we need to understand therefore is that the problem is not Christianity, the problem is the _misapplication_ of Christianity.

AS I wrote in my booklet, Erasing America:

“… Christian faith, though it is the center of the West’s historic and spiritual being, cannot by itself provide the enduring structure of Western society or of any other concrete society. As is suggested by Jesus’ statement on the things of Caesar and the things of God, religious faith must work in a proper balance with worldly values—among which are the values of _culture_. Without a particular earthly culture to ground it, and an articulated Church tradition to give it lasting form, Christianity can easily spin off into utopian universalist notions, such as the current open-borders ideology and the fantasy of ‘world citizenship,’ that spell the death of any existing culture.”

http://www.aicfoundation.com/booklets.htm

Posted by: Lawrence Auster on January 10, 2004 3:23 PM

Dear Goy,

Thank you indeed for your support. Yes, I think the blinders finally came off me, as I somehow feel they will more and more off other white people. Maybe we’ve had enough of the destruction of our culture?

Mil-i-tant: 1. Engaged in warfare or combat 2. Aggressively active (as in a cause) - Webster’s. Believe me, I’m not advocating violence in any form. THAT would be not only morally wrong but unproductive. Besides, I have too much respect for Mr. Auster to compromise him in any way.

Remember, “The Pen is Mightier than the Sword.”

Regards,
WA

Posted by: WA on January 10, 2004 3:44 PM

Lawrence,

As I’ve said to Goy Genius, I don’t advocate violence of any sort. The liberal left has hurt European culture with the pen, and I intend using the same weapon to undo their damage (in as far as my limited powers allow me.) Perhaps you are right that the “Principled White Man” is a better term for us.

“Feudalism was destroyed by the cannon, the modern world, by the pen”

- Napoleon

Cheers,
WA

Posted by: WA on January 10, 2004 4:04 PM

Dear WA,

I apologize for misreading your earlier post. I have probably been brainwashed into thinking the worst of any white person who doesn’t apologize for being white. And I am one of these people! It’s going to take a lot of work to undo the damage that has been done to our culture.

All the best,

Goy

Posted by: Goy Genius on January 10, 2004 4:10 PM

Dear Goy,

You are as guilty of brainwashing as I am. But no more.

It is indeed going to take a lot of work to undo the damage, but I feel it can be done, it MUST be done.

The best,
WA

Posted by: WA on January 10, 2004 4:30 PM

As a potential example of loving one’s enemies in the context of preserving one’s nation, I offer the following instance.

Lance Lambert, a Jewish Christian, wrote in his book “The Battle For Israel” about the 1973 Yom Kippur War. He was in Jerusalem during the war, when many Israelis at one point thought they were finished and were genuinely scared.

Brother Lambert and other Christians held prayer meetings, imploring the Lord to intervene on Israel’s behalf and grant her victory over the invaders. This prayer was answered, as 2 or 3 incidents rivaling the Dunkirk rescue occured, allowing Gen. Sharon to regroup and send the invaders back home.

What was interesting in this context is that while these Christians prayed for Israel’s survival, they also prayed for Christian soldiers they knew about who were fighting in the Syrian and Egyptian armies! asking that God would extend his Providential protection over them during that horrific episode.

They well knew that the answer to their overall invocation for Israel’s survival might mean the death of these Christian soldiers. But their prayers for Israel’s victory was no contradiction to their intercession for these soldiers — which in turn was no contradiction to their prayers for Israel’s triumph!

Posted by: Joel LeFevre on January 10, 2004 8:49 PM

Joel, you have a point in what you say. Thank you.

Posted by: WA on January 12, 2004 2:15 PM

Testing… No messages accumulating. Is there a problem?

Posted by: WA on January 17, 2004 12:24 PM
Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:


Remember info?





Email entry

Email this entry to:


Your email address:


Message (optional):